Artificial argument assistants for defeasible argumentation
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Artificial argument assistants for defeasible argumentation
The present paper discusses experimental argument assistance tools. In contrast with automated reasoning tools, the objective is not to replace reasoning, but to guide the user’s production of arguments. Two systems are presented, ARGUE! and ARGUMED based on DEFLOG. The focus is on defeasible argumentation with an eye on the law. Argument assistants for defeasible argumentation naturally corres...
متن کاملLogics for Defeasible Argumentation
4 General features of argument-based semantics 15 4.1 The `unique status assignment' approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 4.1.1 Fixed-point de nitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 4.1.2 Recursive de nitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 4.2 The `multiple status assignment' approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 4.3 Comparing the two approaches . . . . . . . . . . ...
متن کاملArgumentation Semantics for Defeasible Logics
Defeasible logic is a simple but efficient rule-based non-monotonic logic. It has powerful implementations and shows promise to be applied in the areas of legal reasoning and the modelling of business rules. So far defeasible logic has been defined only proof-theoretically. Argumentation-based semantics have become popular in the area of logic programming. In this paper we give an argumentation...
متن کاملArgumentation Semantics for Defeasible Logic
Defeasible reasoning is a simple but efficient rule-based approach to nonmonotonic reasoning. It haspowerful implementations and shows promise to be applied in the areas of legal reasoning and themodeling of business rules. This paper establishes significant links between defeasible reasoning andargumentation. In particular, Dung-like argumentation semantics is provided for two key ...
متن کاملThe Toulmin Argument Model in Artificial Intelligence Or: how semi-formal, defeasible argumentation schemes creep into logic
In 1958, Toulmin published The Uses of Argument. Although this anti-formalistic monograph initially received mixed reviews (see section 2 of [20] for Toulmin’s own recounting of the reception of his book), it has become a classical text on argumentation, and the number of references to the book (when writing these words1 — by a nice numerological coincidence — 1958) continues to grow (see [7] a...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Artificial Intelligence
سال: 2003
ISSN: 0004-3702
DOI: 10.1016/s0004-3702(03)00107-3